Moz extension firefox

Listings. Because of this the Moz Chrome Extension no longer shows results past first results.I also often find that when a site is ranked above the Maps, it doesn't display results.Is there a fix for this? Moz Bar | | HercMagnus 0 How do I see amount of traffic to a particular page on a website? I am trying to figure out how much traffic goes to a particular page on a website. How would I go about finding this? Moz Bar | | jbcorcoran 6 Spam score of 28 % Hello,I checked my website spam score in link explorer and found out it has got 28 %.What do you recommend I do ? should I ask for all the links to be removed (even though some of them are no followed)Is it possible that google has penalised me because of that score and de-ranked me ?Thank you, Moz Bar | | seoanalytics 1 SEOMOZ Toolbar for FIREFOX [Moz Extension Firefox] SEOMOZ toolbar for firefox - where to find it - i could find only for chrome Moz Bar | | alexbudko 10

#166 - Firefox - is not opening after latest 2.1 updateDenysOd commented on Sep 25, 2020Extension is not opening in Firefox after latest updateFirefox 80.0.1 (64-bit)Ubuntu 16.04 - Ubuntu 4.15.0-118.119~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18shridhar-tl commented on Sep 25, 2020It works well with windows and unfortunately, I do not have any system except Windows to test it. Can you please provide more details on what is the behaviour you are observing? Are you seeing the menu when you click on JA icon or not?Can you try to access following urls and see if it loads properly. Also see if their are any errors in console:moz-extension://5289744f-3a44-4931-8c86-c6e8acd616fa/index.htmlmoz-extension://5289744f-3a44-4931-8c86-c6e8acd616fa/menu.htmlDenysOd commented on Sep 25, 2020I can see Menu but clicking on its points does not have any reactionsProvided URL are not openingNo console error are presentNote: After Executing mentioned above steps - I got access Assistant at address moz-extension://9073d4e8-93f0-40c6-b4db-7f6300e6c674/index.html#/2/dashboard/0So basically you can close this defect - look like local troublesThanks in advanceshridhar-tl commented on Sep 25, 2020Based on your confirmation, closing this issue. Please feel free to reopen this ticket if you continue to face this issue again.

15px; background: #ccc; border-radius: 16px;}With this method, we don’t have to target the track component specifically. The input container element takes the slider role.However, for this project, we’ll go with the next approach — using the browser’s vendor prefixes to specifically target the slider track. So, let’s remove the newly added style declarations.As we mentioned above, the ::-webkit-slider-runnable-track pseudo-element will target the slider track for WebKit-based browsers. Meanwhile, the ::-moz-range-track pseudo-element will target the track for Mozilla Firefox:/* Track: webkit browsers */input[type="range"]::-webkit-slider-runnable-track { height: 15px; background: #ccc; border-radius: 16px;}/* Track: Mozilla Firefox */input[type="range"]::-moz-range-track { height: 15px; background: #ccc; border-radius: 16px;}The range slider should now look like this:Customizing the slider thumbFor WebKit-based browsers, we’ll start by removing the default styles of the native slider thumb and then adding custom styles:/* Thumb: webkit */input[type="range"]::-webkit-slider-thumb { /* removing default appearance */ -webkit-appearance: none; appearance: none; /* creating a custom design */ height: 15px; width: 15px; background-color: #fff; border-radius: 50%; border: 2px solid #f50;}For Mozilla Firefox, we’ll only apply the custom styles:/* Thumb: Firefox */input[type="range"]::-moz-range-thumb { height: 15px; width: 15px; background-color: #fff; border-radius: 50%; border: 1px solid #f50;}Due to how Mozilla handles the thumb, we reduced the border from the 2px applied for WebKit browsers to 1px so the thumb can fit appropriately in the range slider.Keep in mind that Mozilla applies a gray border to the thumb by default. You can add a border: none; property if you don’t want to apply a border.The slider should now look like this:As we can see,

Skip to content I was on Firefox today and wanted to search for a bookmark. I found the bookmark easily, but unlike Chrome Firefox has no way of showing which folder the bookmark is present in. So I created a PowerShell script to do just that. Mainly because I wanted some excuse to code in PowerShell and also because it felt like an interesting problem.PowerShell can’t directly control Firefox as it doesn’t have a COM interface (unlike IE). So you’ll have to manually export the bookmarks. Good for us the export is into a JSON file, and PowerShell can read JSON files natively (since version 3.0 I think). The ConvertFrom-JSON cmdlet is your friend here. So export bookmarks and read them into a variable: $bookmarks = Get-Content \path\to\bookmarks-2015-03-11.json | ConvertFrom-Json This gives me a tree structure of bookmarks. PS> $bookmarksguid : root________title :index : 0dateAdded : 1422217616861000lastModified : 1423076331270000id : 1type : text/x-moz-place-containerroot : placesRootchildren : {@{guid=menu________; title=Bookmarks Menu; index=0; dateAdded=1413121004000000; lastModified=1426013312897000; id=2; type=text/x-moz-place-container; root=bookmarksMenuFolder; children=System.Object[]}, @{guid=toolbar_____; title=Bookmarks Toolbar; index=1; dateAdded=1413121004000000; lastModified=1426014543697000; id=3; type=text/x-moz-place-container; root=toolbarFolder; children=System.Object[]}, @{guid=unfiled_____; title=Unsorted Bookmarks; index=3; dateAdded=1357715408000000; lastModified=1426044593123000; id=5; type=text/x-moz-place-container; root=unfiledBookmarksFolder}} Notice the children property. It is an array of further objects – links to the first-level folders, basically. Each of these in turn have links to the second-level folders and so on.The type property is a good way of identifying if a node is a folder or a bookmark. If it’s text/x-moz-place-container then it’s a folder. If it’s text/x-moz-place then it’s a bookmark. (Alternatively one could also test whether the children property is $null).So how do we go through this tree and search each node? Initially I was going to iteratively do it by going to each node. Then I remembered recursion (see! no exercise like this goes wasted! I had forgotten about recursion). So that’s easy then.Make a function. Pass it the bookmarks object.Said function looks at the object passed to it.If it’s a bookmark it searches the title and lets us know if it’s a match.If it’s a folder, the function calls itself with the next level folder as input.Here’s the function: 12345678910111213141516171819202122 function Search-FxBookmarks { param($Bookmarks, [string]$PathSoFar="", [string]$SearchString) $NodeName = $Bookmarks.title $NewPath = "$PathSoFar\$NodeName" if ($Bookmarks.type -eq "text/x-moz-place-container") { # We are on a non-leaf node # Check if the non-leaf node name itself matches the search string if ($NodeName -match $SearchString) { Write-Host -ForegroundColor Cyan "$PathSoFar\$NodeName" } # Then call ourselves recursively for each of the children foreach ($Bookmark in $Bookmarks.children) { Search-FxBookmarks -Bookmarks $Bookmark -PathSoFar $NewPath -SearchString $SearchString } } if ($Bookmarks.type -eq "text/x-moz-place") { # We are on a leaf node, search if the title matches the search string if ($NodeName -match $SearchString) { Write-Host -ForegroundColor Green "$PathSoFar\$NodeName" } }} I decided to search folder names too. And just to distinguish between folder names and bookmark names, I use different colors.Call the function thus (after exporting & reading the bookmarks into a variable): Search-FxBookmarks -Bookmarks $bookmarks -SearchString "whatever" Here’s a screenshot of the output: Post navigation --> © 2025

Both the slider track and thumb have rounded shapes. If you want to make the shape rectangular, you can remove the border-radius CSS property from the components:input[type="range"]::-webkit-slider-runnable-track { /* border-radius: 16px; */}/* Track: Mozilla Firefox */input[type="range"]::-moz-range-track { /* border-radius: 16px; */}input[type="range"]::-webkit-slider-thumb { /* border-radius: 50%; */}input[type="range"]::-moz-range-thumb { /* border-radius: 50%; */}Styling the range slider to show track progressUsing only CSS, we can style the range slider to show track progress by filling the space to the left of the thumb with box-shadow and then hiding the overflow from the input[type="range"] selector.Let’s locate the ::-webkit-slider-thumb and ::-moz-range-thumb pseudo-elements and then add the following box-shadow declaration:/* Thumb: webkit */input[type="range"]::-webkit-slider-thumb { /* ... */ /* slider progress trick */ box-shadow: -407px 0 0 400px #f50;}/* Thumb: Firefox */input[type="range"]::-moz-range-thumb { /* ... */ /* slider progress trick */ box-shadow: -407px 0 0 400px #f50;}After that, in the input[type="range"] selector, let’s add the following declarations:input[type="range"] { /* ... */ /* slider progress trick */ overflow: hidden; border-radius: 16px;}The styled slider should now behave like the first example in the GIF below:How to improve the CSS range slider with JavaScriptWith the addition of JavaScript, we’ll create a range slider that looks like this:See the Pen Custom input range: CSS & JS by Ibaslogic (@ibaslogic)on CodePen.Due to the overflow: hidden and box-shadow tricks we used to customize the slider progress with the CSS-only solution, the slider thumb cannot be larger than the track — the way it’s shown below:To achieve the above design, we’ll modify the CSS

To use the category name following with a forward slash (even if you have a redirect from xxx.com/search to xxx.com/search/)(Check out Google robots.txt guidelines)if you want to block the directory "search" and its content, use Disallow : /search/ (no need for asterisk at the end)if you use "Disallow: /hc/en-us/search/" (again, no need for asterisk) you will block all the content under xxx.com/hc/en-us/search/So, for example if you have content that you want to block under xxx.com/hc/fr-FR/search/ it will not be blocked because your statement/directive limits it to a very specific "search" directory which is located under "en-US".What is it that you want to block exactly? Got a burning SEO question? Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own. Start my free trial Browse Questions View From Sorted by With category Explore more categories Moz Tools Chat with the community about the Moz tools. SEO Tactics Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers Community Discuss industry events, jobs, and news! Digital Marketing Chat about tactics outside of SEO Research & Trends Dive into research and trends in the search industry. Support Connect on product support and feature requests. See all categories Related Questions Unsolved Mozbar extension now showing spam score mozbar 2024 I have using extension and login my account and set free trial of one month but in this case i can't see spam score in Moz bar so how I can solve this Moz Bar | | BarshaEmiactech 0 Unsolved New Moz